Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Front Mol Biosci ; 10: 1060076, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2279524

ABSTRACT

The new coronavirus SARS-COV-2, which emerged in late 2019 from Wuhan city of China was regarded as causing agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary protease which is also known by various synonymous i.e., main protease, 3-Chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLPRO) has a vital role in the replication of the virus, which can be used as a potential drug target. The current study aimed to identify novel phytochemical therapeutics for 3CLPRO by machine learning-based virtual screening. A total of 4,000 phytochemicals were collected from deep literature surveys and various other sources. The 2D structures of these phytochemicals were retrieved from the PubChem database, and with the use of a molecular operating environment, 2D descriptors were calculated. Machine learning-based virtual screening was performed to predict the active phytochemicals against the SARS-CoV-2 3CLPRO. Random forest achieved 98% accuracy on the train and test set among the different machine learning algorithms. Random forest model was used to screen 4,000 phytochemicals which leads to the identification of 26 inhibitors against the 3CLPRO. These hits were then docked into the active site of 3CLPRO. Based on docking scores and protein-ligand interactions, MD simulations have been performed using 100 ns for the top 5 novel inhibitors, ivermectin, and the APO state of 3CLPRO. The post-dynamic analysis i.e,. Root means square deviation (RMSD), Root mean square fluctuation analysis (RMSF), and MM-GBSA analysis reveal that our newly identified phytochemicals form significant interactions in the binding pocket of 3CLPRO and form stable complexes, indicating that these phytochemicals could be used as potential antagonists for SARS-COV-2.

2.
Journal of Molecular Pathology ; 3(4):201-218, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-2066213

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the world population adversely, posing a threat to human health. In the past few years, various strains of SARS-CoV-2, each with different mutations in its structure, have impacted human health in negative ways. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mutations influence the virulence, antibody evasion, and Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) affinity of the virus. These mutations are essential to understanding how a new strain of SARS-CoV-2 has changed and its possible effects on the human body. This review provides an insight into the spike mutations of SARS-CoV-2 variants. As the current scientific data offer a scattered outlook on the various type of mutations, we aimed to categorize the mutations of Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.612.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) systematically according to their location in the subunit 1 (S1) and subunit 2 (S2) domains and summarized their consequences as a result. We also compared the miscellany of mutations that have emerged in all four variants to date. The comparison shows that mutations such as D614G and N501Y have emerged in all four variants of concern and that all four variants have multiple mutations within the N-terminal domain (NTD), as in the case of the Delta variant. Other mutations are scattered in the receptor binding domain (RBD) and subdomain 2 (SD2) of the S1 domain. Mutations in RBD or NTD are often associated with antibody evasion. Few mutations lie in the S2 domain in the Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants. However, in the Omicron variant many mutations occupy the S2 domain, hinting towards a much more evasive virus.

3.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 21(2): e171-e178, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1150975

ABSTRACT

Large reductions in emergency department attendances and hospitalisations with non-COVID acute medical illness early during the pandemic were attributed to reluctance to seek medical help and higher referral thresholds. Here, we compare acute medical admissions with a comparison cohort from 2017. Deaths in the same geographic area were examined, and Wales-wide deaths during these 4 weeks in 2020 were compared with a seasonally matched period in 2019. There were 528 patients admitted with non-COVID illness in 2020, versus 924 in 2017 (a reduction of 43%). Deaths from non-COVID causes increased by 10.9% compared with 2017, over half this rise being from neurological causes including stroke and dementia. While far fewer patients required hospitalisation as medical emergencies, rises in local non-COVID deaths proved small. Wales-wide non-COVID deaths rose by just 1% compared with 2019. The findings suggest that changes in population behaviour and lifestyle during lockdown brought about unforeseen health benefits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Quarantine , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Wales/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL